Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Fery vs Philip Sekulic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fery vs Sekulic analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Fery vs Philip Sekulic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fery 0 - 0 Sekulic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fery has won 46.38% of points on his second serve, while Sekulic has won 49.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fery, in recent form, has won 49.76% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sekulic has won 49.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.58% and 29.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fery has saved 61.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sekulic has saved 63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fery has won 65% of matches played (W/L 39/ 21), with Sekulic winning 54.43% (W/L 43/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fery has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 35/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Fery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14), where as Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fery has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.57 while Sekulic has played against players with an average rank of 254.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fery has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sekulic has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fery has converted 45.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sekulic has converted 42.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fery 0 - 0 Sekulic
249
Rank
249
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
257
Rank
257
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
62% (90-56)
Career Total W/L
55% (90-73)
63% (10-6)
YTD W/L
47% (14-16)
$32,000
Career Prize Money
$92,390
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Fery | Philip Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (10/6) | 47% (14/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (22/13) | 48% (34/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (184/152) | 50% (349/350) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 52% (14/13) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 122 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 99 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:35 | 2:3:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 341.06 | 315.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (717/1118) | 60% (1385/2303) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (494/717) | 69% (953/1385) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (186/401) | 49% (454/918) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (55/122) | 42% (83/196) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (451/1066) | 38% (839/2206) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (8/5) | 50% (14/14) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (10/15) | 47% (14/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 33% (4/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 14% (14/2) |
Arthur Fery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
James Duckworth
Player
Arthur Fery
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Arthur Fery
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Ricardas Berankis
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Arthur Fery
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 6-7(8) 4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Arthur Fery
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Jules Marie
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Philip Sekulic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Remy Bertola
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
54%
(
70 of
129)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
53 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Brandon Holt
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
110)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Philip Sekulic
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
14
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Andrew Fenty
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
4
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Philip Sekulic
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Federico Cina
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
11
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fery Vs Sekulic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
